Class Action

FitMiss Fat-Burning Supplements

Class Action

FitMiss Fat-Burning Supplements

July 2015: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed.

October 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against MusclePharm Corporation for allegedly deceptively advertising FitMiss Fat-Burning supplements. The complaint, which was originally filed in Nevada and later transferred to Colorado, alleges that the company claims, among other things, that the supplements will “reduce[] body fat,” “boost” and “promote” metabolism, and “burn [] fat” when, in reality, the supplements are not effective for fat burning or weight control. (Bey et al v. MusclePharm Corporation, Case No. 14-cv-02881, D. CO.).

For more information about the weight-loss supplements and TINA.org’s coverage of the products, click here.

 


Class-Action Tracker

MusclePharm Glutamine Dietary Supplement

Class Action

MusclePharm Glutamine Dietary Supplement

In March 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against MusclePharm Corp. for allegedly falsely advertising the dietary supplement MusclePharm Glutamine. According to the complaint, the company markets the supplement as…

The Packaging of Various MusclePharm Supplements

Class Action

The Packaging of Various MusclePharm Supplements

August 2016: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. as to the named plaintiffs and When a complaint is dismissed without…

Various MusclePharm Supplements

Class Action

Various MusclePharm Supplements

September 2016: A federal judge granted MusclePharm’s motion to dismiss finding, among other things, that plaintiffs did not have standing, failed to state a claim, and did not satisfy the…


The Latest

Filters