Fairlife Milk
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that milk comes from cows that are treated humanely
Fairlife
Case Name (Date)
Thomas et al. v. Fairlife, LLC and The Coca-Cola Co. et al.
25-cv-1650, C.D. Cal.
(Feb. 2025)
Product/Service
Fairlife
Allegations
Falsely marketing that the company cares for animals and has zero tolerance for animal cruelty when the company supplies milk from facilities that abuse, neglect, torture and torment cows
Falsely marketing that the company uses sustainable practices when the company’s practices have a negative impact on the environment
Falsely marketing that plastic packaging is recyclable when the opaque containers contain a contaminant to the recycling process (titanium dioxide, or TiO2)
Status
Pending
(Claims against two individual defendants dismissed in January 2026 and certain claims against Coca-Cola, Fairlife, and Select Milk dismissed in February 2026)
Class-Action Tracker
Core Power Elite Vanilla High Protein Milk Shake
Core Power Vanilla Milk Shake
Fairlife Milk Products
The Latest
Whose Settlement is Better For You: Vitaminwater or Red Bull?
Vitaminwater and Red Bull were both sued for falsely marketing their beverages as providing specific health/functional benefits.
Vitaminwater Settlement Scorecard: Consumers $0, Class-Action Lawyers $1.2 Million
Ad Watchdog TINA.org Rallying Consumers to Object MADISON, CONN., October 21, 2014 — A proposed vitaminwater class-action settlement is of little benefit to consumers who have been deceived by Coca-Cola’s…
Gatorade Challenges BodyArmor’s ‘Superiority’ Claims
Issue heads to the FTC following a complaint from competing sports drink Gatorade.
Five Companies that Fail the Name Game
What’s in a name? Sometimes not what you expect.
POM vs. Coke: Supreme Court’s Juicy Ruling
Supreme Court rules on POM juice labeling issue.