
Dynamic Pet Products The Real Ham Bone For Dogs
August 2017: A state judge granted final approval of the settlement.
April 2017: A state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a false advertising class-action lawsuit against Dynamic Pet Products. The complaint alleges that the company deceptively markets The Real Ham Bone For Dogs as being appropriate and safe for dogs when, according to plaintiffs, the product is “extremely hazardous” when chewed by dogs because it splits into shards that cause severe internal injuries and contains bacterial toxins that cause illness and death.
The settlement agreement provides class members with a maximum of $2,500 for each claim of pet injury or death resulting in veterinary expenses (with a cap of $50,000 per year). Class members may also receive a $3 refund for each product purchased (for up to 10 bones with proof of purchase, or up to four bones without proof of purchase). In addition, the company agreed to stop manufacturing or selling pig bone products for dogs until they are reformulated to be “more durable than an uncooked bone” or the company has insurance coverage to compensate owners of pets who have been killed or injured from consuming the bones.
A final fairness hearing is scheduled for August 3, 2017. For more information, go to https://www.realhambonesettlement.com/. (Taylor et al v. Dynamic Pet Products, LLC et al, Case No. 1616-CV11531, Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri at Independence)
For more information about the marketing of pet products, click here.
Class-Action Tracker


Dynamic Real Ham Bone For Dogs
The Latest

Covid-19 conspiracies are dividing the ‘clean’ beauty industry
Janna Mandell, The Lily

Mary Kay’s Deceptive Pinky Promises

Mary Kay Off-Roads into Deceptive Income Claims
The pink Cadillac is just one of many things top-selling distributors tout but few distributors achieve.

Walmart to invest $350 billion in U.S. manufacturing
Abha Bhattarai, Washington Post

Puff Bar Flavors Resurface Following FDA Ban
FDA says it is aware of the situation but declined to comment on the regulatory status of disposable e-cigarette brand.