Dunkin’ Refreshers
Allegations: Products do not contain the fruits in the product names
Schoenrock et al. v. Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. and Inspire Brands, Inc.
26-cv-6058, E.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2026)
Wells et al. v. Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. and Inspire Brands, Inc.
26-cv-14463, D. Mass.
(Sept. 2026)
Dunkin Zero beverages
Falsely marketing products as containing zero grams of sugar when they contain the sugar allulose
Pending
Allegations: Products do not contain the fruits in the product names
Allegations: Failing to disclose hidden fees in advertised prices
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “Made With Real Cream”
Allegations: Charging consumers more than the prices advertised in the mobile app
TINA.org urges the FTC to adopt a fee disclosure rule for the online food delivery market.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
Advertised $19.99 price deserves an official review.
See how you stack up.
Be wary of claims of free or low-cost delivery.