Public Storage
There’s more in store with these advertised prices.
Diamond of California Walnuts
In 2010, a class action was brought against Diamond Foods alleging that the company made false and misleading statements in its marketing material about the health benefits of eating walnuts. (Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-1192-JSW, N.D.Ca.)
Update: In 2012, the parties settled this lawsuit. Diamond agreed to provide $2.6 million to reimburse consumers who bought its walnuts. If you purchased Diamond of California walnuts between 2006 and 2012, you may be eligible for a refund of $3.25 or $8.25.
The Latest
American Beverage Association’s Every Bottle Back Recycling Initiative
Inquiry finds trade group overstates environmental benefits of recycling program.
Hair-Raising Claims by Unilever’s Nutrafol Reported to Regulators
TINA.org files complaint with the FDA and FTC over company’s hair growth claims.
Consumer Alert: Hair Growth Products
Supplement and serum companies are targeting consumers experiencing hair loss.
CATrends: Marketing Claims for Products Containing PFAS
Class-action lawsuits target human and environmentally-friendly claims.