Dude, where’s my bitcoin? Crypto sits out the Super Bowl after a miserable year
Brian Contreras, Los Angeles Times
Diamond of California Walnuts
In 2010, a class action was brought against Diamond Foods alleging that the company made false and misleading statements in its marketing material about the health benefits of eating walnuts. (Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-1192-JSW, N.D.Ca.)
Update: In 2012, the parties settled this lawsuit. Diamond agreed to provide $2.6 million to reimburse consumers who bought its walnuts. If you purchased Diamond of California walnuts between 2006 and 2012, you may be eligible for a refund of $3.25 or $8.25.
The Latest
Researchers Call on FDA (Again) to Remove ‘Ineffective’ OTC Cold and Flu Medicines
Products marketed to clear up stuffy noses and relieve sinus congestion don’t work, researchers say.
FanDuel and Gronk’s Kick of Destiny Super Bowl Promotion
Think you can bet on Gronk to make (or miss) a field goal? Think again.
FTC Must Stem Tide of Junk Fees Pandemic
TINA.org submits comment regarding the need for a commission rule.
Lume Deodorant’s ‘Aluminum-Free,’ ‘Clinically Proven’ Odor Control Claims
Consumers should sweat these claims.