Carote Granite-Coated Nonstick Cookware
On the menu tonight? Deceptive FDA claims.
Diamond of California Walnuts
In 2010, a class action was brought against Diamond Foods alleging that the company made false and misleading statements in its marketing material about the health benefits of eating walnuts. (Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-1192-JSW, N.D.Ca.)
Update: In 2012, the parties settled this lawsuit. Diamond agreed to provide $2.6 million to reimburse consumers who bought its walnuts. If you purchased Diamond of California walnuts between 2006 and 2012, you may be eligible for a refund of $3.25 or $8.25.
The Latest
Ty J. Young, Revisited
Ty J. Young’s fine print continues to be a must-read for consumers.
TINA.org Reports Online Retailer FabKids to Regulators; Investigation Reveals Deceptive Marketing of Negative-Option Offer
MADISON, CONN. August 30, 2021 – With ads for a blockbuster “2 pairs from $9.95” sale on kids shoes, online footwear and clothing retailer FabKids knows how to lure in…
FabKids’ Back-to-School Ads Mislead Parents
Online retailer deceptively advertises members-only prices, TINA.org investigation finds.
Ad or Not? Beyoncé and Tiffany & Co.
Why Queen B may need to “Check on It” before endorsing brands on Insta.