Merchandise on www.devacurl.com
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
In April 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against DevaCurl for allegedly misleadingly marketing that its hair products – including No-Poo Original conditioning cleanser, One Condition Original hair conditioner, Light Defining Gel, Wavemaker, and others – provide benefits over other hair products when, according to the complaint, the company does not warn consumers that DevaCurl’s products cause several adverse reactions, including scalp irritation, excessive shedding, hair loss, and balding. (Crawley et al v. Deva Concepts, LLC d/b/a DevaCurl, Case No. 20-cv-3152, S.D.N.Y.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of hair products, click here.
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.