Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
The Latest
Legacy Cremation Services Violating Federal Court Order
TINA.org complaint with FTC and DOJ urges renewed action to stop serial offender.
Legacy Cremation Services Brazenly Violating Federal Court Order
MADISON, CONN. May 12, 2026 – Legacy Cremation Services continues to prey on grieving families nationwide despite a federal court order intended to stop its deceptive practices, according to a…
Garden & Gather’s ‘100% Money Back Guarantee’ and ‘Free Returns’
Consumers’ attempts to obtain a full refund may only yield a meager harvest.
New York City is Taking on Shady Subscriptions
And TINA.org is all for it.
What You Should Know about Kalshi
Prediction market faces legal challenges on multiple fronts.