Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
The Latest
Sweet Suspicion: A Waitrose Mystery
A Waitrose Mystery: A family Christmas takes an unexpected turn in this tale of mystery, intrigue… and pudding.
Optics Outfitter
Why this eyewear company’s advertised “starting” prices may not be 20/20.
Court Order Forces Prevagen to Scrub Memory-Improvement Claims
MADISON, CONN. Dec. 12, 2024— In a win for consumers, a court has ordered Quincy Bioscience to stop advertising Prevagen using memory-improvement claims. This follows a near-decade-long campaign by the…
Prevagen Scrubs Memory-Improvement Claims Following Court Order
What led up to brain supplement’s December to remember.
The Perimenopause Gold Rush
Jessica Bennett, The Cut