Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
The Latest
LifeLock’s Identity Theft Protection
Is your Social Security number as vulnerable as this company claims?
The McRib
Lawsuit alleges the McRib is a McScam.
2026 Deceptive Ad Trends
A closer look at what we’ll be monitoring in the new year.
Why ‘Click-to-Cancel’ Still Matters – and Why the FTC Should Try Again
The problem hasn’t gone away.
Amazon’s Great Holiday Climb
Why parents may need to be called in to this Roblox game rated 13+.