Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
The Latest
CATrends: Empty Space in Consumer Goods
Lawsuits aren’t giving any slack when it comes to underfilled packages.
Domino’s $6.99 Pizzas
Why advertise a price that no consumer will pay?
Columbia. Engineered For Whatever.
Columbia is made for anything nature could throw at you.
Military Glasses & Libiyi
Watch out for online retailers’ bait-and-switch tactics.
America’s Best
Why your options may be limited in claiming this eyeglasses deal.