Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
In January 2014, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Bridal Warehouse for, among other things, allegedly misrepresenting its wedding gowns as new. The named plaintiff claims that she special ordered a new dress and paid a premium to have it shipped directly from the manufacturer when, in reality, she received a dress that had been used in another Bridal Warehouse showroom. (Witak v. Bridal Warehouse Inc., Jefferson Circuit Court in Louisville, Kentucky).
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.
FTC alleges company pressures consumers into overpaying for its tax filing software.