Boost Glucose Control Drinks
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that drinks are “designed for people with diabetes” to “help manage blood sugar” without adequate scientific evidence to support such claims
Horti et al. v. Nestle USA, Inc.
21-cv-9812, N.D. Cal.
(Dec. 2021)
Boost Glucose Control, Boost Glucose Control High Protein, and Boost Glucose Control Max
Misleadingly marketing that products help manage blood sugar, control glucose, and are “designed for people with diabetes” without the legally required FDA approval to make such claims and without adequate scientific support
Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.; Reversed on appeal
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that drinks are “designed for people with diabetes” to “help manage blood sugar” without adequate scientific evidence to support such claims
Despite a successful FTC lawsuit against Nestle for marketing its Boost Kid Essentials drink as an immune system booster and illness preventer (which resulted in Nestle agreeing to stop making…
What you should know about this purported brainfood for Fido.
Baby formula company did not have science to back up claims, government agency alleges.
Premium pet food company says its products may have contained by-products because of a supplier mistake.
Purina and Blue Buffalo in legal feud over by-products.
A majority have faced false-ad challenges within past five years.