Boost Glucose Control Drinks
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that drinks are “designed for people with diabetes” to “help manage blood sugar” without adequate scientific evidence to support such claims
Horti et al. v. Nestle USA, Inc.
21-cv-9812, N.D. Cal.
(Dec. 2021)
Boost Glucose Control, Boost Glucose Control High Protein, and Boost Glucose Control Max
Misleadingly marketing that products help manage blood sugar, control glucose, and are “designed for people with diabetes” without the legally required FDA approval to make such claims and without adequate scientific support
Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.; Reversed on appeal
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that drinks are “designed for people with diabetes” to “help manage blood sugar” without adequate scientific evidence to support such claims
Despite a successful FTC lawsuit against Nestle for marketing its Boost Kid Essentials drink as an immune system booster and illness preventer (which resulted in Nestle agreeing to stop making…
Surge in class-action lawsuits follows congressional report.
It’s the perfect formula for a class-action lawsuit trend.
Class-action lawsuits ground product’s “spring water” claims.
In honor of the Fourth of July, a reminder that not all “USA-made” products meet the legal definition.
Pet owners, take note: These products may not be deserving of your doggie dollars.