ToyotaCare Plus Maintenance Plans
Allegations: Falsely marketing that the plans costs less than paying for scheduled services individually
October 2019: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint bringing similar allegations.
September 2019: The case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-2550, E. D. MO.)
June 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Toyota for allegedly representing that drivers can use the Bluetooth hands-free phone systems in vehicles to make and receive phone calls without adequately disclosing that an echo defect makes the hands-free system difficult to use. (Freeman et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Case No. 19SL-CC03022, Missouri State Court – St. Louis)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Toyota, click here.
Allegations: Falsely marketing that the plans costs less than paying for scheduled services individually
Allegations: Failing to disclose that certain internet-enabled features in vehicles would become inoperable when 3G was phased out
Allegations: Failing to disclose that certain features available in Lexus Enform, Toyota Safety Connect, and Entune App – including roadside emergency safety features – would become inoperable when 3G services…
Allegations: Falsely marketing that certain vehicles are equipped with adaptive headlights when the vehicles aren’t equipped with the safety feature
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that hybrid vehicles travel farther on one tank of gas than gas-only vehicles when such claims are not true
In February and March 2020, two class-action lawsuits were filed against Toyota for allegedly misleadingly marketing that the fuel tanks in RAV4 vehicles hold 14.5 gallons of gas when, according…
In February 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Toyota for allegedly misleadingly marketing 2018-2019 Toyota vehicles equipped with certain low-pressure fuel pumps as safe and dependable when, according to…
A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Toyota in November 2017 (and amended in June 2018). Specifically, the complaint claims that the company falsely advertises that the headlights in…
November 2016: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. as to the individual claims of the named plaintiffs and When a…
In February 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Toyota for allegedly deceptively promoting a “tire savings event.” According to the complaint, Toyota represents that consumers who purchase three tires…
In July 2016, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Toyota for allegedly representing that the Prius Plug-In can operate for approximately 13 miles on a full charge without adequately disclosing…
Consumer accuses dealership of pulling a bait and switch.
Automaker addresses its use of prototypes in TV ad.
Instant replay shows six instances in which Super Bowl 52 advertisers have fumbled ad claims.