BayPort Credit Union
In April 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against BayPort Credit Union for allegedly misleadingly representing that it charges overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees when an account does not have enough money to cover a transaction when, according to plaintiffs, the credit union assesses such fees using an artificial balance that deducts holds placed on deposits and pending transactions instead of the actual balance. In addition, plaintiffs claim that the credit union misleadingly represents that it charges only one fee on a single transaction when, according to the complaint, a new fee is charged every time a transaction is reprocessed for payment resulting in multiple fees being charged on one transaction. (Barker et al v. BayPort Credit Union, Case No. 20-cv-195, E.D. Va.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks and credit unions, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
Poland Spring ORIGIN
Poland Spring charges consumers a premium for its ORIGIN water. What are they getting in return?
The Cost of Doing Business
Comparing the amount companies agree to pay to settle deceptive marketing charges with their annual revenue.
Immunotype
Unmasking a supplement maker’s deceptive COVID claims.
Federal officials look to crack down on deceptive subscription marketing practices at broad range of firms
Yeganeh Torbati, Washington Post
Beyond Meat: Made without ‘Synthetically Produced Ingredients’?
TINA.org investigates ingredients in company’s flagship product, the Beyond Burger.