
Babyganics SPF 50+ Sunscreens
December 2017: This case was stayed pending a nationwide settlement in a related case, Mayhew v. KAS Direct and S. C. Johnson & Son.
October 2017: The claims against VMG Partners were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The claims against S. C. Johnson & Son remain pending.
August 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against S. C. Johnson & Son and VMG Partners for allegedly falsely advertising babyganics mineral-based sunscreens as being SPF 50+ when, according to plaintiffs, the SPF of the sunscreens is no more than, and sometimes much lower than, SPF 30. (Carroll et al v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and VMG Partners, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-5828, N.D. Ill.)
For more information about TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of sunscreens, click here.
Class-Action Tracker


Babyganics Bath Products

Babyganics Pre-Moistened Wipes
The Latest

The 2022 Benefits Helpline
How helpful is this helpline?

Wells Fargo Phishing Scam
TINA.org reader receives suspicious text.

The FTC Needs to Implement a Deceptive Earnings Claims Rule
Consumers can’t afford to go it alone when it comes to atypical income claims.

Public Investing App’s ‘Up To $300 in Free Stock’ Offer
Key phrase: “up to.” The average reward is only five bucks.

Roblox Misses Revenue Estimates on Slowing Post-Pandemic Growth
Cecilia D’Anastasio, Bloomberg