Axe Antiperspirants
Allegations: Deceptively marketing that products provide “Anti Marks Protection” when the active ingredient actually causes white marks and yellow stains
Axe Anti-Marks Antiperspirants
October 2019: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-2723, E. D. MO.)
July 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Unilever for allegedly falsely marketing that its Axe Anti Marks Protection line of antiperspirants provides protection from and do not produce white marks and yellow stains when, according to plaintiffs, the active ingredient (aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex GLY) causes white marks and yellow stains on clothing. (Crepps et al v. Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever, Case No. 19JE-CC00489, Missouri State Court – Jefferson County)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of deodorants, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Packaging of Degree, Dove and Axe
In August 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Unilever for allegedly deceptively using You know when you buy a big bag of chips, and you’re all psyched for a…
The Latest
Suave Essentials Body Wash
Unilever loses appeal to keep Bath & Body Works fragrance comparisons on product packaging.
5 Not-So-Natural Personal Care Products
With Earth Day right around the corner, here’s a handful of items whose earthy claims have been challenged.
Ad or Not? New York Magazine
Hype or editorial content regarding this hyperpigmentation serum?
Ad or Not? Snapchat and DJ Khaled
Is DJ Khaled the key endorser on Snapchat?
Six Super Bowl Advertisers Offsides on the Truth
TINA.org’s Big Game scorecard on companies under fire for deceptive ads.