Extra: Overthink Less. Chew Good.
Every now and then you overthink.
In February 2014, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Atlas Roofing Corporation for allegedly misleadingly representing its Atlas Chalet shingles in various marketing materials, including brochures and labels. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the company expressly represents that its shingles will be “free from manufacturing defects” for 30 years when, in reality, the shingles will blister and crack before 30 years have passed. In addition, the complaint alleges that the company represents that its shingles conform to applicable industry standards and building codes when, in reality, they do not. (Denson et al v. Atlas Roofing Corporation, Case No. 14-cv-00335, N. D. AL.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Atlas Roofing Corporation and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
To see more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the marketing of shingles and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Every now and then you overthink.
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.
TINA.org sheds light on confusing and misleading brightness claims.
Brant James, Ingame
Company becomes the latest to leave the industry.