Ambit Energy Rates
February 2018: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the terms, class members will receive a partial refund for the amount they paid while on…
In June 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Ambit Energy for allegedly marketing itself as less expensive than other utility companies when, in reality, Ambit customers end up paying more for energy. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Ambit promises that its budget billing program helps customers “avoid the highs and lows of the usual energy bill” when the program actually “mask[s] the company’s exorbitant energy rates” by failing to inform customers that the budget payments do not cover all of the amounts due and misrepresent the balance customers owe, as well as by adding additional charges to the final bills. (Lazarek et al v. Ambit Energy Holdings, LLC, Ambit New York, LLC, and Ambit Northeast, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-6361, W. D. NY.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against energy suppliers and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
February 2018: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the terms, class members will receive a partial refund for the amount they paid while on…
March 2017: A federal judge granted Ambit’s motion for summary judgment concluding that there was no fraudulent misrepresentation or fraudulent intent, among other things. To learn more about the judge’s…
September 2015: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. after plaintiffs failed to amend claims that were dismissed When a complaint is…
TINA.org investigation finds 98% of MLMs using misleading income claims.
Readers have told us to look into these MLMs.