Ambit Energy Rates
February 2018: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the terms, class members will receive a partial refund for the amount they paid while on…
March 2017: A federal judge granted Ambit’s motion for summary judgment concluding that there was no fraudulent misrepresentation or fraudulent intent, among other things. To learn more about the judge’s decision, click here to read the full court order.
2015: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Ambit Energy for allegedly using a pyramid scheme to defraud consumers by, among other things, promising free energy and other perks to its consultants who sign-up new customers. The complaint also alleges that Ambit’s marketing materials offer customers who switch to Ambit “low, competitive rates” and “consistent rates” without telling them that the company’s rates fluctuate and can spike any time resulting in higher monthly energy bills for customers. (Kostovetsky et al v. Ambit Energy Holdings, LLC et al, Case No. 15-cv-2553, N.D. Ill.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Ambit Energy, click here.
February 2018: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the terms, class members will receive a partial refund for the amount they paid while on…
September 2015: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. after plaintiffs failed to amend claims that were dismissed When a complaint is…
In June 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Ambit Energy for allegedly marketing itself as less expensive than other utility companies when, in reality, Ambit customers end up paying…
TINA.org investigation finds 98% of MLMs using misleading income claims.
Readers have told us to look into these MLMs.