Rear-View Displays in Volvo Vehicles
Allegations: Marketing vehicles as safe when the rear-view camera display malfunctions and disappears
Heyert et al. v. Swickard Ravenna, LLC, Swickard Bellevue, LLC, Swickard Management Company, and Volvo Car USA LLC
25-cv-1726, W.D. Wash.
(July 2025)
2016-2022 Volvo vehicles, including XC60, XC90, and S60 models
Marketing vehicles as safe without disclosing that their braking systems may fail due to a defect
Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Allegations: Marketing vehicles as safe when the rear-view camera display malfunctions and disappears
Allegations: Marketing that the system provides a “user-friendly interface and unparalleled connectivity” when it freezes, reboots, crashes, and fails
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing Volvo’s Sensus as compatible with the Android Auto app when it’s not
TINA.org digs into shop’s purported Newport roots, and more.
TINA.org staffer gets surprise charge.
TINA.org files complaint with NYC over company’s “$19.95” truck rentals.
Lawsuit cries fowl over preservative-free claims.
Lawsuits target misleading subject lines.