Air Wick Sandalwood Air Fresheners
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products contain sandalwood essential oil
August 2016: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
April 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Reckitt Benckiser for allegedly deceptively marketing Airwick® aerosol sprays as having the capability to eliminate odors and last up to one hour when, according to the plaintiffs, the sprays only mask odors and have little, if any, odor eliminating capabilities, and cannot provide an hour of freshness. (Agrawal et al v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Case No. 16-cv-2497, S.D.N.Y.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding aerosol sprays and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products contain sandalwood essential oil
In September 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Reckitt Benckiser for allegedly deceptively advertising that Air Wick® aerosol room sprays “eliminate[] odors” when, according to plaintiffs, the sprays mask…
A class-action lawsuit was filed against Reckitt Benckiser for allegedly misleadingly claiming that Air Wick® aerosol sprays “eliminate[] odors” when, according to plaintiffs, the sprays mask odors instead of eliminating…
In August 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Reckitt Benckiser for allegedly falsely marketing Air Wick® aerosol sprays as being capable of eliminating odors when, according to plaintiffs, the…
An FDA panel’s recent findings has led to a flood of lawsuits.
Products marketed to clear up stuffy noses and relieve sinus congestion don’t work, researchers say.
TINA.org files brief urging court to deny final approval of settlement that is unfair to consumers.
It’s the perfect formula for a class-action lawsuit trend.