There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Browne et al. v. Arkk Food Co. and Wahlburgers I, LLC
23-cv-4603, E.D.N.Y.
(June 2023)
Counts et al. v. Arkk Food Co. and Wahlburgers I, LLC
23-cv-236, N.D. Ill.
(Jan. 2023)
Mayer et al. v. Patriot Pickle Inc., Arkk Food Co., and Wahlburgers I, LLC
23-cv-1299, W.D.N.Y.
(Nov. 2023)
Wahlburgers pickles
Falsely advertising products as “fresh,” “all natural,” and containing “no preservatives” when they contain an artificial chemical preservative (sodium benzoate)
Browne case: Settled as part of the settlement in the Counts case and voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Counts case: Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
Mayer case: Settled as part of the settlement in the Counts case and voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.