There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
VICTOR and VICTOR PESTCHASER
In August 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Woodstream Corp. for allegedly misleadingly representing that VICTOR® and VICTOR® PESTCHASER® ultrasonic repellers will drive rodents away from homes by emitting noises that can only be heard by rodents when, according to plaintiffs, the repellers do not work as advertised and there is no scientific evidence supporting the advertising claims. (Heumann et al v. Woodstream Corp., Case No. 19-cv-1077, N.D.N.Y.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of pest repeller products, click here.
The Latest
TINA.org Action Sheds Light on SunPowerLED’s False Endorsement Claims
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
VIN History USA’s ‘Free’ VIN Report
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
Amica Insurance: Back To Zero
Recent ad shows what it takes to make a comeback.
Will the MLM Industry Fix Its Earnings Claims Problem?
New research points to “no.”