 
				
				
											
																TracFone Wireless
Allegations: Misrepresenting that it protects customers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in 2021
Esposito et al. v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
MID-L-006360-23, New Jersey state court – Middlesex county
(Nov. 2023) 
Verizon wireless service plans
Falsely advertising monthly rates that do not include an “Administrative Charge”
Settled
(Final approval granted) 
https://verizonadministrativechargesettlement.com/
Allegations: Misrepresenting that it protects customers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in 2021
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that Verizon is committed to protecting the environment and people when its cables are covered in toxic lead
Allegations: Falsely advertising that phones are unlocked
Allegations: Charging subscribers more than the advertised rate by adding an undisclosed fictitious fee to their monthly bills
Allegations: Falsely advertising monthly rates of wireless service plans
Carriers facing challenges to advertisements.
Expecting cold hard cash out of this offer? Think again.
All told, that’s $290M going back to wireless consumers who federal regulators said were unfairly charged.
Self-regulatory group tells Sprint to drop advertising claims following T-Mobile complaint.
Digging into the fine print and details behind four recent ads.
 
				
				
											
																 
				
				
											
																 
				
				
											
																 
				
				
											
																 
				
				
											
																 
				
				
											
																 
				
				
											
																 
				
				
											
																 
				
				
											
																