
TracFone Wireless
Allegations: Misrepresenting that it protects customers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in 2021
Esposito et al. v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
MID-L-006360-23, New Jersey state court – Middlesex county
(Nov. 2023)
Verizon wireless service plans
Falsely advertising monthly rates that do not include an “Administrative Charge”
Settled
(Final approval granted)
https://verizonadministrativechargesettlement.com/
Allegations: Misrepresenting that it protects customers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in 2021
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that Verizon is committed to protecting the environment and people when its cables are covered in toxic lead
Allegations: Falsely advertising that phones are unlocked
Allegations: Charging subscribers more than the advertised rate by adding an undisclosed fictitious fee to their monthly bills
Allegations: Falsely advertising monthly rates of wireless service plans
Corporate doublespeak is as hard to decipher as the questionable claims in the ads themselves.
Find out which telecom companies are under scrutiny for misleading ads.
Not to be confused with “unlimited” data plans.
You may want to hit the mute button on these challenged cable claims.