
Spark Energy Rates
Allegations: Using a bait-and-switch marketing scheme by offering a teaser rate followed by a variable market rate without disclosing that the variable rate is higher than the teaser rate and…
June 2019: This case was transferred from a court in Illinois to another in New Jersey where a similar case (Rolland v. Spark Energy) is pending. (Case No. 19-cv-14114, D.N.J.)
March 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Spark Energy for allegedly using a bait-and-switch marketing scheme in which it lures consumers to switch to their electricity supplier by offering a low rate for a specific number of months followed by a competitive market rate when, according to the complaint, the company charges market rates that are higher than the rates of other electricity suppliers. In addition, plaintiffs claim that Spark Energy charges them undisclosed monthly administrative fees. (Harty et al v. Spark Energy, LLC, Case No. 19-cv-2151, N.D. Ill.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Spark Energy, click here.
Allegations: Using a bait-and-switch marketing scheme by offering a teaser rate followed by a variable market rate without disclosing that the variable rate is higher than the teaser rate and…
In December 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Spark Energy (a supplier of electricity and natural gas) for allegedly engaging in a deceptive bait-and-switch scheme. According to the complaint,…
Underwear seller strips a number of marketing claims after a TINA.org inquiry.
TINA.org notifies electric vehicle maker for second time in three years.
Getting hangry over a hidden delivery fee.
A deceptive marketing trend takes root.
Legislators should protect the work of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.