Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Subscriptions to Cerebral
Case Name (Date)
Debono et al. v. Cerebral, Inc.
22-cv-3378, N.D. Cal.
(June 2022)
Product/Service
Subscriptions to Cerebral
(a telemedicine company that provides access to therapy, counseling, and medication)
Allegations
Failing to disclose that subscribers’ access to various mental health services is contingent on the availability of counselors, therapists, and prescribers in their geographic area
Misleadingly marketing that subscribers can cancel subscriptions anytime when the company makes it difficult to cancel subscriptions
Status
Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
The Latest
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
FTC Takes TruHeight’s Growth Claims Down a Few Pegs
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
FTC Cracks Down on Forever Living Following Years of Deception
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.