Case Name (Date)

Kominis et al. v. Starbucks Corp.
22-cv-6673, S.D.N.Y.
(Aug. 2022)

McAllister et al. v. Starbucks Corp.
22-cv-1410, E.D. Cal.
(Aug. 2022)


Product/Service

Starbucks Refreshers


Allegations

Beverages do not contain the fruits advertised in the product name


Status

Kominis case: Pending

McAllister case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.



Class-Action Tracker

Oatly, Glucerna and Others

Class Action

Oatly, Glucerna and Others

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as healthy, safe, and high quality without disclosing that they may contain harmful bacteria


The Latest

Filters

Starbucks Verismo Coffee System

Ad Alert

Starbucks Verismo Coffee System

Starbucks advertised its Verismo at-home coffee system as making “coffeehouse quality lattes…” or “Lattes … made to cafe standard… ,” though presumably without acoustic folk-rock CDs and a coffee cup…