Class Action

Sixt Rent-A-Car Supplemental Insurance

Class Action

Sixt Rent-A-Car Supplemental Insurance


Case Name (Date)

Vitale-Renner et al. v. Sixt Rent-A-Car, LLC and National Casualty Co.
20-cv-62289, S.D. Fla.
(2020)


Product/Service

Sixt Rent-A-Car Supplemental Liability Excess Policy


Allegations

Misleadingly representing that the premiums charged for supplemental insurance are paid to third-party insurance companies when Sixt keeps nearly all of the amount charged as profit


Status

Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.



The Latest

Filters

TINA.org Files FTC Complaint against Homeaglow

Press Release

TINA.org Files FTC Complaint against Homeaglow

MADISON, CONN. Sept. 9, 2025 – An investigation by consumer advocacy organization truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org) has found that Homeaglow is deceptively advertising $19 home cleanings in order to lure consumers into…


Show More