2026 Deceptive Ad Trends
A closer look at what we’ll be monitoring in the new year.
August 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
April 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a false advertising lawsuit against Similasan Corporation. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2012, alleges that the company’s homeopathic products – including Stress & Tension Relief, Sleeplessness Relief, and Sinus Relief – are deceptively labeled because they do not work as advertised. According to the settlement terms, class members with proof of purchase may receive a refund (estimated to be at least $3.50) for each product purchased, while class members without proof of purchase are limited to one refund. In addition, the company agreed to make changes to product labels, including providing more information to future purchasers. (Allen et al v. Similasan Corp., Case No. 12-cv-376, S. D. CA.)
For more information about the marketing of homeopathic products and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
A closer look at what we’ll be monitoring in the new year.
The problem hasn’t gone away.
Why parents may need to be called in to this Roblox game rated 13+.
Taking advantage of these perks may be harder than advertised.
Looking back at our accomplishments