
The Truth about ‘Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitors’
Why diabetes patients should research carefully before buying.
Sliwa et al. v. Sezzle Inc.
22-cv-3055, C.D. Cal.
(May 2022)
Sliwa et al. v. Sezzle Inc.
22-cv-6093, C.D. Cal.
(July 2022)
Sezzle’s Buy Now, Pay Later services
Misleadingly marketing that Sezzle is a free service with no fees, interest or other catches without adequately warning users of the risk that banks processing Sezzle payments will charge them multiple overdraft fees
Sliwa Case (No. 22-cv-3055): Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Sliwa Case (No. 22-cv-6093): Settled
(Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.)
Why diabetes patients should research carefully before buying.
Can you really make bank playing solitaire on your phone?
Don’t get lost in this outdoor company’s dubious origin story.
Stephanie Zimmermann, Chicago Sun Times
Aerie commits to no AI and no retouching.