RushMyPassport
Does this passport service live up to its name?
Sezzle’s Buy Now, Pay Later Services
Case Name (Date)
Sliwa et al. v. Sezzle Inc.
22-cv-3055, C.D. Cal.
(May 2022)
Sliwa et al. v. Sezzle Inc.
22-cv-6093, C.D. Cal.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Sezzle’s Buy Now, Pay Later services
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that Sezzle is a free service with no fees, interest or other catches without adequately warning users of the risk that banks processing Sezzle payments will charge them multiple overdraft fees
Status
Sliwa Case (No. 22-cv-3055): Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Sliwa Case (No. 22-cv-6093): Settled
(Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.)
The Latest
CATrends: Hypoallergenic Marketing Claims
A rash of lawsuits allege companies are misleading consumers.
Ghost Girls
The Halloween ‘haunt’ that isn’t.
Titleist Golf Balls
Lawsuit accuses company of duping consumers into buying “unwanted” golf balls.
Jess Stewart (aka Micro Bakery Girl)
Will you really make thousands of dollars a month as a home baker?