Sentry Natural Defense
Allegations: Falsely advertising products as safe and “Veterinarian Tested”
Sentry Natural Defense
Case Name (Date)
Penikila et al. v. Petiq, LLC d/b/a Sentry
19-cv-5508, N.D. Cal.
(Aug. 2019)
Product/Service
Sentry Natural Defense
Allegations
Misleadingly advertising products as “safe to use around children and pets” when they contain essential oils that are toxic and may cause health issues, including skin irritation, vomiting, and muscle tremors
Misleadingly marketing that products are “Veterinarian Tested” when veterinarians do not recommend them
Status
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
Did Timothée Chalamet Just Take a Dig at Deceptive Marketing?
Why I’m a fan of this Adidas World Cup ad.
‘Bet Now’: How Wagering Apps’ Push Notification Ads Bombard Consumers
TINA.org joins petition urging FTC to require consent and opt-out for gambling marketing.
Does Gatorade ‘Hydrate Better than Water’?
Lawsuits takes aim at sports drinks’ superior hydration claim.
Phoebe Gates’s Startup Phia Was Just Accused of ‘Cookie Stuffing.’ Here’s What Happens Next
Esther Lian, Inc.com
Airport Retailers Can Now Charge an Employee Benefits Fee—but It May Not Go to Workers
Georgia Fearn, Inc.com