Riddell Revolution Helmets

May 2014: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. because the consolidated claims were filed in In Re Riddell Concussion Reduction Litigation (Case No. 13-7585, D. NJ.).

February 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Riddell, Inc. for allegedly misleadingly advertising its Revolution football helmets. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the company represents that the Revolution helmet reduces the incidence of concussion by 31% (when compared to traditional helmets) without scientific evidence to support such claims. (Galvan et al v. Riddell, Inc.; All American Sports Corporation d/b/a Riddell/All American Riddell Sports Group; Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.; Easton-Bell Sports, LLC; EB Sports Corporation; RBG Holdings Corporation; and Does 1-10, Case No. 14-cv-00359, S. D. CA.).

For more information about the other class-action lawsuits filed against Riddell, Inc. and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.