RushMyPassport
Does this passport service live up to its name?
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Case Name (Date)
Rush et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
24-cv-8542, C.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2024)
Slattery et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
23-cv-10078, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2023)
Product/Service
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing products as serums that are safe to use to improve the appearance of eyelashes and eyebrows without warning of the serious side effects and risks associated with using one of the ingredients in them (dihdroxy difluoro ethylcloprostenolamide, or DDDE) near the eyes
Status
Rush case: Consolidated with Slattery v. Athena Cosmetics
Slattery case: Pending
The Latest
CATrends: Hypoallergenic Marketing Claims
A rash of lawsuits allege companies are misleading consumers.
Ghost Girls
The Halloween ‘haunt’ that isn’t.
Highsnobiety: Touching Grass In The North Face
Be prepared, look on point, go touch grass.
Titleist Golf Balls
Lawsuit accuses company of duping consumers into buying “unwanted” golf balls.