The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
Hoffman et al v. Primal Force, Inc.
20-cv-20600, D.N.J.
(Dec. 2020)
Primal Max Red
Deceptively advertising that supplements treat male potency problems and erectile dysfunction
Pending
The DSA misses the mark.
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?