What You Should Know about Home Projectors
TINA.org sheds light on confusing and misleading brightness claims.
Prices on Lens.com
Multiple class-action lawsuits alleging that Lens.com fails to include all of its mandatory fees in advertised prices were transferred to be heard by the same court. Some of the lawsuits also allege that Lens.com misleadingly calls a processing fee “Taxes & Fees.” Click here and here to see the court orders. More information on the lawsuits is below.
| Case Name (Date) |
Allegations | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Franks et al. v. Lens.com, Inc. 24-cv-724, D. Nev. (April 2024) |
Failing to include a processing fee in advertised prices | Pending |
| Nail et al. v. Lens.com, Inc. 24-cv-1149, D. Nev. (March 2024) |
Failing to include a processing fee (which is misleadingly called “Taxes & Fees” when no portion of the fee is due to taxes) in advertised prices | Pending |
| Martin et al. v. Lens.com, Inc. 24-cv-2160, D. Nev. (Feb. 2024) |
Failing to include a processing fee (which is misleadingly called “Taxes & Fees” when no portion of the fee is due to taxes) in advertised prices | Pending |
| Gonneville et al. v. Lens.com, Inc. 24-cv-1151, D. Nev. (Feb. 2024) |
Failing to include a processing fee in advertised prices | Pending |
| Fitzpatrick et al. v. Lens.com, Inc. 24-cv-2203, D. Nev. (Feb. 2024) |
Failing to include a processing fee (which is misleadingly called “Taxes & Fees” when no portion of the fee is due to taxes) in advertised prices | Pending |
The Latest
Under The Influence: Prediction Markets Are Harnessing Modern Joe Camels
Brant James, Ingame
Forever Living Ditching MLM Model
Company becomes the latest to leave the industry.
Fixing the Subscription Trap
The FTC’s Negative Option Rule do-over – and what’s at stake.
A Brand Story
Be wary of questionable and deceptive claims in origin stories.