Multiple class-action lawsuits alleging that Lens.com fails to include all of its mandatory fees in advertised prices were transferred to be heard by the same court. Some of the lawsuits also allege that Lens.com misleadingly calls a processing fee “Taxes & Fees.” Click here and here to see the court orders. More information on the lawsuits is below.

Case Name
(Date)
Allegations Status
Franks et al. v. Lens.com, Inc.
24-cv-724, D. Nev.
(April 2024)
Failing to include a processing fee in advertised prices Pending
Nail et al. v. Lens.com, Inc.
24-cv-1149, D. Nev.
(March 2024)
Failing to include a processing fee (which is misleadingly called “Taxes & Fees” when no portion of the fee is due to taxes) in advertised prices Pending
Martin et al. v. Lens.com, Inc.
24-cv-2160, D. Nev.
(Feb. 2024)
Failing to include a processing fee (which is misleadingly called “Taxes & Fees” when no portion of the fee is due to taxes) in advertised prices Pending
Gonneville et al. v. Lens.com, Inc.
24-cv-1151, D. Nev.
(Feb. 2024)
Failing to include a processing fee in advertised prices Pending
Fitzpatrick et al. v. Lens.com, Inc.
24-cv-2203, D. Nev.
(Feb. 2024)
Failing to include a processing fee (which is misleadingly called “Taxes & Fees” when no portion of the fee is due to taxes) in advertised prices Pending

The Latest

Filters


Show More