Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Pocket Hose
In January 2014 a federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement to a class-action lawsuit against Telebrands for, among other things, allegedly misleadingly labeling and advertising the Pocket Hose. According to the settlement terms, class members with proof of purchase may receive a refund of up to $20. For more information, go to www.hosesettlement.com. (Arreguin et al v. Telebrands and Does 1-10, Case No. CIVRS1307798, Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Bernadino).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the marketing of the Pocket Hose and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the marketing of garden hoses and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The Latest
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
FTC Takes TruHeight’s Growth Claims Down a Few Pegs
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
FTC Cracks Down on Forever Living Following Years of Deception
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.