In June 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Cynosure, Inc. for allegedly falsely advertising that the PicoSure Picosecond Aesthetic Workstation eliminates tattoos using laser technology when, in reality, it does not remove tattoos. (LDGP, LLC d/b/a Hartsough Dermatology et al. v. Cynosure, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-50148, N. D. IL.)
MADISON, CONN. Sept. 9, 2025 – An investigation by consumer advocacy organization truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org) has found that Homeaglow is deceptively advertising $19 home cleanings in order to lure consumers into…
TINA.org files complaint against home cleaning platform with FTC, states.
Lawsuits aren’t giving any slack when it comes to underfilled packages.
Why advertise a price that no consumer will pay?
Watch out for online retailers’ bait-and-switch tactics.