
Confession: I Fell for HelloFresh’s ‘Free Breakfast’
A reminder to be careful about ad claims that may seem too good to be true.
January 2018: This case was dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement. The terms of the agreement have not been disclosed. The named plaintiff’s individual claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. and the class members’ claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled..
August 2017: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 17-cv-5094, N.D. Cal.)
July 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Philosophy, Inc. regarding the marketing of its “Ultimate Miracle Worker” products. The complaint alleges that the company makes unlawful drug claims about the products – including that they “help your skin rebuild its natural collagen” and “naturally rejuvenate itself” – and unlawfully markets them as drugs without the proper approval from the FDA to do so. (Bogdanic et al v. Philosophy, Inc. et al, Case No. 1702773, California Superior Court – County of Marin)
For more information about the marketing of cosmetics and TINA.org’s coverage of the products, click here.
A reminder to be careful about ad claims that may seem too good to be true.
The bottom line? Toothpaste tubes aren’t generally getting recycled.
Lawsuits allege products contain ingredients harmful to coral reefs and marine life.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.
Company walks back composting claim following TINA.org inquiry sparked by self-regulatory ad challenge.