Herbal Essences and Pantene Essential Botanicals Shampoos and Conditioners
Allegations: Falsely marketing the percentage of natural ingredients in products
February 2016: The lawsuit was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have yet to be disclosed.
November 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble for allegedly misleadingly marketing Pantene® Pro-V Expert Collection Advanced Keratin Repair Shampoo and Conditioner products. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the company markets the products as having the ability to repair two years of damage in one wash or two minutes when, in reality, they do not contain any ingredients with the ability to repair two years’ worth of hair damage in the short time frame specified. (Lee et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company, Case No. 15-cv-6516, E. D. NY.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding products containing keratin and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Procter & Gamble and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Falsely marketing the percentage of natural ingredients in products
Allegations: Misleadingly using the word “Nature” and images of an avocado and a green leaf to make consumers believe products are natural when they actually contain non-natural ingredients
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain a carcinogen
See how you stack up.
You are having an old hair day, you old person.