
Pencils Down: Princeton Review Revises Marketing following TINA.org Investigation
SAT test prep company comes clean about its money-back guarantee.
Doe et al. v. Fenix Internet LLC et al.
23-cv-3005, C.D. Cal.
(April 2023)
Muto et al. v. Fenix International Limited et al.
22-cv-2164, C.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2022)
OnlyFans
Failing to adequately disclose the terms of subscriptions
Doe case: Consolidated with Muto case
Muto case: Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
SAT test prep company comes clean about its money-back guarantee.
Illegal claims that company’s products prevent hair loss also need to go.
MADISON, CONN. December 1, 2022 – Acting on a complaint filed by ad watchdog, truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), California regulators have reached a settlement with lingerie company Savage X Fenty, originally a joint venture between…
Complaints allege violations of state securities laws.
Lingerie company agrees to pay $1.2 million to settle lawsuit