
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Doe et al. v. Fenix Internet LLC et al.
23-cv-3005, C.D. Cal.
(April 2023)
Muto et al. v. Fenix International Limited et al.
22-cv-2164, C.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2022)
OnlyFans
Failing to adequately disclose the terms of subscriptions
Doe case: Consolidated with Muto case
Muto case: Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.