These Super Bowl LVIII Advertisers Have Been Taken to Court for Deceptive Marketing
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
A class-action lawsuit was filed against Oakmont Senior Living for allegedly engaging in a scheme to defraud seniors, people with disabilities, and their families at its assisted living facilities in California. The complaint alleges that facilities falsely represent that personnel performs assessments of residents and provides them with the care they need when, according to the complaint, Oakmont designs budgets for staffing at facilities to maximize profits resulting in facilities that do not have enough trained staff to provide the promised care to residents. The lawsuit was originally filed in state court in September 2017 and transferred to federal court in October 2017. (Lollock et al v. Oakmont Senior Living, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-5912, N.D. Cal.)
For more information about class-action lawsuits regarding seniors and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
Consumer complaints regarding alleged surprise charges are piling up.
Holy crop.
It’s not the first time the company has been accused of pulling a bait and switch.
Company makes marketing changes following TINA.org inquiry.