HP Envy 13 Ultrabook Laptops with NVIDIA GeForce MX150 Graphics Cards
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the speed and performance of laptops when only certain versions of the laptop perform as advertised
December 2016: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement.
August 2016: A federal judge preliminarily approved this settlement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for December 7, 2016.
July 2016: After 15 similar class-action lawsuits against Nvidia Corp. were consolidated, the parties moved for preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the proposed settlement terms, class members may receive a $30 cash refund for each unit purchased. (In Re Nvidia GTX 970 Graphics Chip Litigation, Case No. 15-cv-760, N. D. CA.)
2015: Between February and July 2015, at least seven class-action lawsuits were filed against Nvidia Corporation for allegedly falsely representing the specifications and capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 graphics processing units. Among other things, the complaints allege that the company misleadingly markets the graphics cards as providing 4 GB of VRAM and 64 ROPs when, in reality, they do not.
To read the complaints, click on the case information below.
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the speed and performance of laptops when only certain versions of the laptop perform as advertised
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”