Natrol’s Glucosamine Supplements

March 2016: The remaining lawsuits (Dao, Eisner, and Lesher) were administratively closed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. because Natrol filed bankruptcy proceedings.

September 2015: One of the named plaintiffs (Nowicki) agreed to dismiss her claims. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed.

Early 2015: Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Natrol for allegedly falsely advertising that its dietary supplements containing glucosamine and chondroitin will provide consumers with many joint health benefits without scientific evidence to support such claims. The lawsuits were all transferred to one court in Maryland so that the related claims can be heard together. To learn more about each case, click on the case information below.

• Dao et al v. Natrol, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-2433, S. D. CA.
  
• Eisner et al v. Natrol, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-05831, E. D. N.Y.
• Lesher et al v. Natrol, Inc., Natrol Acquisition Corp., Natrol Direct, Inc. and Natrol Products, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-01867, N. D. IL.
• Nowicki et al v. Natrol, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-01870, D. MD.

(In Re: Natrol, Inc., Glucosamine/Chondroitin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2528, Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation).

For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Natrol and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding glucosamine and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.