Class Action

Natrol Dietary Supplements

Class Action

Natrol Dietary Supplements

December 2014: This class-action lawsuit was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For more information about the reasons for the dismissal, click here to read the June 2014 order.

February 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Natrol, Inc. for making deceptive marketing claims regarding its supplements Natrol L-Arginine 3000, Natrol L-Arginine 1000, and MRI NO2 Platinum. Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that Natrol falsely claims that its supplements provide increased formation of nitric oxide in the blood, improve male sexual performance, strengthen immunity, improve cardiovascular function, increase circulation of oxygen and nutrients, and support increased lean muscle tissue, among other things. (Kachi v. Natrol, Inc. et al., Case No. 13-cv-00412, S.D. Cal.)

 


Class-Action Tracker

Natrol Cognium Memory

Class Action

Natrol Cognium Memory

Allegations: Falsely marketing that products improve memory and contain the “#1 most clinically studied ingredient for memory” when scientific evidence does not substantiate such claims

Natrol’s Biotin Supplements

Class Action

Natrol’s Biotin Supplements

In June 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Natrol for allegedly misrepresenting that Biotin products – including Fast Dissolve and Maximum Strength varieties – will “Promote[] Healthy Hair and…

Natrol’s Glucosamine Supplements

Class Action

Natrol’s Glucosamine Supplements

March 2016: The remaining lawsuits (Dao, Eisner, and Lesher) were administratively closed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. because Natrol…


The Latest

Filters