Natrol Cognium Memory
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products improve memory and contain the “#1 most clinically studied ingredient for memory” when scientific evidence does not substantiate such claims
December 2014: This class-action lawsuit was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For more information about the reasons for the dismissal, click here to read the June 2014 order.
February 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Natrol, Inc. for making deceptive marketing claims regarding its supplements Natrol L-Arginine 3000, Natrol L-Arginine 1000, and MRI NO2 Platinum. Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that Natrol falsely claims that its supplements provide increased formation of nitric oxide in the blood, improve male sexual performance, strengthen immunity, improve cardiovascular function, increase circulation of oxygen and nutrients, and support increased lean muscle tissue, among other things. (Kachi v. Natrol, Inc. et al., Case No. 13-cv-00412, S.D. Cal.)
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products improve memory and contain the “#1 most clinically studied ingredient for memory” when scientific evidence does not substantiate such claims
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “100% Drug-Free” when they contain ethyl alcohol
In June 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Natrol for allegedly misrepresenting that Biotin products – including Fast Dissolve and Maximum Strength varieties – will “Promote[] Healthy Hair and…
March 2016: The remaining lawsuits (Dao, Eisner, and Lesher) were administratively closed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. because Natrol…
The largest retailer in the world isn’t just turning a blind eye to the deceptive marketing of these products.