There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Nabisco Newton Cookies
May 2015: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the case.
October 2013: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal.
September 2013: A federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit filed against Mondelez International, Inc. d/b/a Nabisco. The complaint claimed that the company misleads consumers by marketing products – including the Strawberry Newtons and the Raspberry Newtons – as “made with real fruit” when the products actually contain fruit purée. The judge dismissed the complaint finding that the plaintiffs failed to adequately plead that puréed fruit is not “real fruit.” (Manchouck et al. v. Mondelez International Inc. d/b/a Nabisco, Case No. 13-cv-02148, N.D. Cal.).
The Latest
TINA.org Action Sheds Light on SunPowerLED’s False Endorsement Claims
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
VIN History USA’s ‘Free’ VIN Report
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
Will the MLM Industry Fix Its Earnings Claims Problem?
New research points to “no.”
TINA.org Supports Citizen Petition Calling for AI Pricing Transparency
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.